Convicted of a 1985 Provo murder on a confession he says was coerced and testimony later recanted, Carter spent about four decades under a death sentence before new DNA testing excluded him from key crime-scene evidence.
On Sept. 28, 2026, Fourth District Judge Derek Pullan ordered Carter, now 71, released on bail over the objections of the victim's family.3 A week earlier, Utah County prosecutors withdrew their notice seeking the death penalty after DNA results excluded him as the source of blood on a doorknob and genetic material on the handle of the murder weapon.3 On Oct. 9, his lawyers asked the court to dismiss the case, arguing that a second trial would amount to double jeopardy because of the state's misconduct.4
Eva Olesen, an aunt of Provo’s police chief at the time, was stabbed and shot in her home on Feb. 27, 1985.3 Her husband, Orla Olesen, told police he found her there.3 Carter, a Chicago native, was living with his mother in Utah at the time.3
According to court documents, the investigation came to focus on Carter as a suspect in a robbery-related killing. By April 1985 he had left Utah, believing he was a suspect in a separate assault case.3 Arrested in Nashville that June, he signed a confession while being interrogated by a Provo detective.3 Carter has long said the confession was false and given under repeated threats from police.3
With no physical evidence tying him to the scene, the state’s case rested on the confession and on Epifanio and Lucia Tovar, a married couple who testified that Carter had bragged about the killing.31 The defense called no witnesses, and the jury convicted him and sentenced him to death.3 After his first death sentence was set aside, a second sentencing jury imposed death again in 1992, and state courts rejected a long series of appeals.31
In 2011, the Tovars were located in Mexico. They said police had coached them to lie on the stand, paid them in cash and gifts they were told not to disclose, and threatened them and their son with deportation if they did not implicate Carter.3
After an evidentiary hearing, Judge Pullan vacated the conviction and death sentence in 2022.6 In May 2025 a unanimous Utah Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the state violated Carter’s due-process rights at both the guilt and sentencing stages by suppressing evidence of the threats and payments and by failing to correct false testimony.51 The court cited multiple instances of intentional misconduct by investigators and a prosecutor.3
DNA testing followed the high court’s order. Results received Sept. 22, 2026 excluded Carter as a contributor to the doorknob blood and the knife-handle sample.3 Carter’s attorney has said crime-scene DNA was also run twice against the FBI database, where Carter’s profile has been since 1995, without a match.3
In April 2026, the defense asked the court to dismiss the case, arguing that an investigator suppressed evidence pointing to other suspects, including the victim’s husband.9 On Oct. 9, after the DNA results, his lawyers filed a second motion. They argue that if the misconduct had come out during the 1985 trial it would have caused a mistrial, so the double-jeopardy protections of the Utah Constitution should bar a new trial even though the misconduct was discovered decades later.4
Carter was born around 1955 and grew up on Chicago’s South Side.32 At his 1992 resentencing, his mother testified that his father left when he was young and that he was raised by an alcoholic stepfather. When he was a teenager the family moved to a mostly white neighborhood, where, she said, he was mistreated because of his race, including being spat on.2 His brother testified that the two were attacked by other children because of their race and that a close friend of Carter’s was killed when they were young. His sister described him as a shy child who loved children.2
His mother also testified that he fell from a bedroom window as a child and hit his head.2 In later federal proceedings, his lawyers said the jury never heard a fuller account: that he grew up in an area known for crime, poverty and gang violence, that his parents and siblings frequently abused drugs and alcohol, and that he was sexually abused as a child by a relative.2
A psychologist who examined Carter over eight days testified that he had organic brain dysfunction, linked to a head injury and the absence of a father figure, and that substance abuse worsened his impaired judgment.2 His lawyers have argued that he has borderline intellectual functioning.2
By early 1985, Carter was living in Utah with his mother.3 After he left the state that spring, he lived for a few weeks in Nashville with a woman and her three children. She was taken into custody along with him, and he has said detectives threatened that she would go to prison if he did not confess.23
At his 1992 resentencing, Carter gave an unsworn statement in which he apologized to the Olesen family and to his own family and asked the jury to spare his life.2 In prison he read, wrote poetry and kept in touch with his mother.2 He has a son who was adopted by another family as an infant and did not learn of the conviction until years later.3
He was released at 71. His lawyer says he will need therapy for what he called “41 years of state-induced trauma.”3
Utah County prosecutors say the DNA does not necessarily exonerate Carter, noting his confession and that the handgun was never found. They have said they will decide how to proceed before the Nov. 10 hearing.34
Carter's lawyers say witnesses saw a white man fleeing the scene and allege an investigator suppressed evidence pointing to other suspects. They argue the state's misconduct should bar a retrial altogether.34
The Olesen family opposed his release. A family member told the court the DNA results do not prove he was not present and asked that the investigation continue.3
Eva Olesen is killed in her Provo home.3
Carter is arrested in Nashville and signs a confession.3
A jury convicts Carter, and he is sentenced to death.3
A new sentencing jury again imposes death.3
The Tovars, located in Mexico, recant and describe payments and threats.3
Judge Pullan vacates the conviction and orders a new trial.6
The Utah Supreme Court affirms in Carter v. State, 2025 UT 13.1
DNA results exclude Carter; prosecutors drop the death penalty.38
Carter is released on bail with GPS monitoring.3
The defense moves to dismiss the case on double-jeopardy grounds.4
The court's next hearing is Nov. 10, 2026, and a jury trial is set for summer 2027. Judge Pullan has not yet ruled on whether Carter's 1985 confession can be used at a retrial.4 Prosecutors have not said whether they are using the new DNA profiles to look for other suspects.3